THE NEW BALLOT BOX

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=New+Ballot+Box

Special Report May 2006

THE NEW BALLOT BOX

Oregon's vote-by mail system promotes civic participation, simplifies voting,
restores confidence - and sidesteps new technological calamities.

Going Postal
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-print.ww?id=11416
With vote by mail, Oregon has higher voter turnout and spends less money
running elections.
By Robert Kuttner

The Oregon Voting Revolution
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-print.ww?id=11417
How a vote-by-mail experiment transformed the democratic process.
By Don Hamilton

Kitchen-Table Democracy
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-print.ww?id=11418
By Don Hamilton

On the Oregon Trail
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-print.ww?id=11419
In a backlash against new electronic calamities, vote by mail spreads far
beyond its roots, one county at a time.
By Sam Rosenfeld

A Technology Too Far
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-print.ww?id=11420
Internet Voting?
By Phil Keisling

Vote By Mail: An Exchange
http://www.prospect.org/web/view-web.ww?id=11486
Sparks fly as six election experts and advocates debate the Prospect’s May
special report, "The New Ballot Box."

By The Editors
Web Exclusive: 05.10.06

The American Prospect's May special report, "The New Ballot Box,” concerns Oregon's vote by mail system and the spread of mail voting across the country. We invited six election law experts and advocates to respond to the report and to debate the merits of all-mail voting. What follows is the first round of the exchange, kicked off by two initial responses to the report by two skeptics
of vote by mail: Curtis Gans of American University and Daniel P. Tokaji of Ohio State University.

* An Accident Waiting to Happen:
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11480
An initial response to “The New Ballot Box,” by Curtis Gans

* Don’t Give Up On HAVA:
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11481
An initial response to “The New Ballot Box,” by Daniel P. Tokaji

* On Turnout and Tampering:
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11485
Four responses to Gans and Tokaji, by Stuart Comstock-Gay, Phil Kiesling,
Adam J. Smith, and Tova Andrea Wang

* A Quick Fix, and Dangerous, Too:
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11483
Responding to comments, by Curtis Gans

* A Step Backwards:
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11484
Responding to comments, by Daniel P. Tokaji

© 2006 by The American Prospect,